Why do you want to do this? Bear in mind that over time, the fact that Solr uses Jetty will become more and more of an implementation detail, and not something you are expected to interact with, so it might work, but that doesn’t mean it will work with all future versions.
Upayavira On Fri, Apr 10, 2015, at 03:18 PM, eirik wrote: > Hi, > > I have not experienced any negatives with having more than 1 > "addConnector" > (using bio.SocketConnector) specified in jetty.xml. e.g 8983, 8984, 8985 > etc > Without knowing to much of whats going on in the background I wanted to > ask > here if anyone know about any problems this might cause? > > Many thanks! > Eirik. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Negatives-of-binding-multiple-ports-in-jetty-xml-tp4198938.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
