I don't understand why copyField doesn't work. Admittedly the firstName and SurName would be separate tokens, but isn't that what you want? The fact that it's multiValued isn't really a problem, multiValued fields are really functionally identical to single valued fields if you set positionIncrementGap to... hmmm.. 1 or 0 I'm not quite sure which.
Of course if your'e sorting by the field, that's a different story..... Here's a discussion with several options, but I really wonder what your specific objection to copyField is, it's the simplest and on the surface it seems like it would work. http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Concat-2-fields-in-another-field-td4086786.html Best, Erick On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:08 AM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, AA-AS/PAS-PTS) <external.ravi.tamin...@us.bosch.com> wrote: > Hi Group, > > I am not sure if we have any easy way to merge two fields data in One Field, > the Copy field doesn’t works as it stores as Multivalued. > > Can someone suggest any workaround to achieve this Use Case? > > FirstName:ABC > SurName:XYZ > > I need an Another Field with Name:ABCXYZ where I have to do at SOLR END.. as > the Source Data is read only and no control to comibine. > > > Thanks > > Ravi
