Hi Dan,

I’m using JavaMelody for my SOLR production servers - gives you the relevant 
HTTP stats (what’s happening now & historical data) plus JVM monitoring as 
additional benefit. The servers are deployed on Tomcat so I’m of little help 
regarding Jetty - having said that

* you need two Jars (javamelody & robin)
* tinker with web.xml

Here are two of my presentations mentioning JavaMelody (plus some other stuff)

http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/presentations/solr-from-development-to-production-20121210.pdf
 
<http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/presentations/solr-from-development-to-production-20121210.pdf>
http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/presentations/jsug-2015/jee-performance-monitoring.pdf
 
<http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/presentations/jsug-2015/jee-performance-monitoring.pdf>
 

Cheers,

Siegfried Goeschl

> On 03 Apr 2015, at 17:53, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> 
> On 4/3/2015 9:37 AM, Davis, Daniel (NIH/NLM) [C] wrote:
>> I wanted to gather QPS for our production Solr instances, but I was 
>> surprised that the Admin UI did not contain this information.   We are 
>> running a mix of versions, but mostly 4.10 at this point.   We are not using 
>> SolrCloud at present; that's part of why I'm checking - I want to validate 
>> the size of our existing setup and what sort of SolrCloud setup would be 
>> needed to centralize several of them.
>> 
>> What is the best way to gather QPS information?
>> 
>> What is the best way to add information like this to the Admin UI, if I 
>> decide to take that step?
> 
> As of Solr 4.1 (three years ago), request rate information is available
> in the admin UI and via JMX.  In the admin UI, choose a core from the
> dropdown, click on Plugins/Stats, then QUERYHANDLER, and open the
> handler you wish to examine.  You have avgRequestsPerSecond, which is
> calculated for the entire runtime of the SolrCore, as well as
> 5minRateReqsPerSecond and 15minRateReqsPerSecond, which are far more
> useful pieces of information.
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1972
> 
> Thanks,
> Shawn
> 

Reply via email to