We have some useful single character terms in the "rating" field, like G and R, alongside PG and others.
wunder On 5/12/08 1:33 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Naomi Dushay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So I'm now asking: why would SOLR want single character terms? > > Solr, like Lucene, can be configured however you want. The example > schema is just that - an example. > > But, there are many field types that might be interested in keeping > single letter terms. > One can even think of examples where single letter terms would be > useful for normal full-text fields, depending on the domain or on the > analysys. > > One simple example: "d-day" might be alternately indexed as "d" "day" > so it would be found with a query of "d day" > > -Yonik
