: Probably a historical artifact. Yeah, probably. fixing the solr example configs would be fairly trivial -- the names are just symbolic strings -- but currently they are all consistent with the lucene packagine names, which would me a more complex cange from a back compat standpoint -- i've opened some linked issues, hopefully someone who is more of an expert on the naming conventions of these packages can chime in and we can clean this up...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7267 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6366 -Hoss http://www.lucidworks.com/
