Great, glad to hear it!

One last question: What release of Solr are you using?

-- Jack Krupansky

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Arsen <barracuda...@mail.ru> wrote:

> Hello Jack,
>
> Jack, you made "my day" for me.
>
> Indeed, when I inserted space between "(" and "*:*" sings - issue
> disappeared. I believe, that according to debug - "space" bug forced
> both parsers to treat part in first brackets as text, right?
>
> It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7249 can be
> closed (root cause is another bug). Let me know if anything more
> needed from my side (should I add comment to it?).
>
> > There was a Solr release with a bug that required that you put a space
> > between the left parenthesis and the "*:*". The edismax parsed query here
> > indicates that the "*:*" has not parsed properly.
>
> > You have "area", but in your jira you had a range query.
>
> You are right, I played with your suggestions about "area" parameter,
> was running different variations of it, but they all give same result.
> So, I left most recent variant (which was shorter, sorry).
>
> Thanks again for your help!
> Have a nice day.
>
> > -- Jack Krupansky
>
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Arsen <barracuda...@mail.ru> wrote:
>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Found discrepancy between LuceneQParser and ExtendedDismaxQParser when
> >> executing following query:
> >> ((*:* AND -area) OR area:[100 TO 300]) AND objectId:40105451
> >>
> >> When executing it through Solr Admin panel and placing query in "q"
> field
> >> I having following debug output for LuceneQParser
> >> ----------------------------------
> >> "debug": {
> >>     "rawquerystring": "((*:* AND -area) OR area:[100 TO 300]) AND
> >> objectId:40105451",
> >>     "querystring": "((*:* AND -area) OR area:[100 TO 300]) AND
> >> objectId:40105451",
> >>     "parsedquery": "+((+MatchAllDocsQuery(*:*) -text:area) area:[100 TO
> >> 300]) +objectId:40105451",
> >>     "parsedquery_toString": "+((+*:* -text:area) area:[100 TO 300])
> >> +objectId: \u0001\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0013\u000fkk",
> >>     "explain": {
> >>       "40105451": "\n14.3511 = (MATCH) sum of:\n  0.034590416 = (MATCH)
> >> product of:\n    0.06918083 = (MATCH) sum of:\n      0.06918083 =
> (MATCH)
> >> sum of:\n        0.06918083 = (MATCH) MatchAllDocsQuery, product of:\n
> >>     0.06918083 = queryNorm\n    0.5 = coord(1/2)\n  14.316509 = (MATCH)
> >> weight(objectId: \u0001\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0013\u000fkk in
> >> 1109978) [DefaultSimilarity], result of:\n    14.316509 =
> >> score(doc=1109978,freq=1.0), product of:\n      0.9952025 = queryWeight,
> >> product of:\n        14.385524 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=1301035)\n
> >> 0.06918083 = queryNorm\n      14.385524 = fieldWeight in 1109978,
> product
> >> of:\n        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:\n          1.0 =
> >> termFreq=1.0\n        14.385524 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=1301035)\n
> >> 1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1109978)\n"
> >>     },
> >> ----------------------------------
> >> So, one object found which is expectable
> >>
> >> For ExtendedDismaxQParser (only difference is checkbox "edismax"
> checked)
> >> I am seeing this output
> >> ----------------------------------
> >> "debug": {
> >>     "rawquerystring": "((*:* AND -area) OR area:[100 TO 300]) AND
> >> objectId:40105451",
> >>     "querystring": "((*:* AND -area) OR area:[100 TO 300]) AND
> >> objectId:40105451",
> >>     "parsedquery": "(+(+((+DisjunctionMaxQuery((text:*\\:*))
> >> -DisjunctionMaxQuery((text:area))) area:[100 TO 300])
> >> +objectId:40105451))/no_coord",
> >>     "parsedquery_toString": "+(+((+(text:*\\:*) -(text:area)) area:[100
> TO
> >> 300]) +objectId: \u0001\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0013\u000fkk)",
> >>     "explain": {},
> >> ----------------------------------
> >> oops, no objects found!
> >>
> >> I hastened to fill https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7249
> >> (sorry, my bad)
> >> You may refer to it for additional info (not going to duplicate it here)
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>  Arsen                          mailto:barracuda...@mail.ru
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Arsen                            mailto:barracuda...@mail.ru
>
>

Reply via email to