Saumitra: We certainly don't mean to be overly discouraging, so have at it! There has been some talk of using Netty in the future as we pull the war-file distribution out of the distro. Now, I have no technical clue about the merits .vs. TCP. But that's another possibility you might want to put into your analysis.
Best, Erick On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Saumitra Srivastav <saumitra.srivast...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks everyone for the responses. > > My motivation for TCP is coming from a very heavy indexing pipeline where > the smallest of optimization matters. I am working on a machine data parser > which feeds data into Cassandra and Solr and we have SLAs based on how fast > we can make data available in both the sources. We used to have issues with > Cassandra as well but we optimized the s**t out of it. > > Now we want to do the same with Solr. While I do realize that this is going > to be a lot of work, but if its something that will reap benefit in long > run, then so be it. Datastax provides a netty based layer in their > enterprise version which folks have reported to be faster. Now just because > a commercial vendor ships it, doesn't mean we will jump into it without > thinking. We will definitely do a effect-vs-effort analysis before > committing to this. > > For majority of users, such high performance might not be a > requirement/priority, so I understand the reluctance to go down this path. > > I think it would be best at this time that I start exploring this option and > get back with my analysis. > > Thanks again. > > Saumitra > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-TCP-layer-tp4191715p4192176.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
