Thanks for your answer Charlie,
Reitzel, Charles wrote > / > It looks like your search term and index are both subject to a stem > filter. Is that right? / > > Yes, that is right and that is what I want ! / > To avoid the default query parser for spellcheck purposes, you might try > spellcheck.q=cartouche. But that may not be sufficient if the spellcheck > field is also "aggressively" stemmed. I.e. try > solr.EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory vs. solr.PorterStemFilterFactory. > Worst case, you may need to copy values to a separate spellcheck field > with less aggressive stemming. / > > > My spellcheck field is not agressive. It doesn't use stem, just * > WhitespaceTokenizer * > , * > StopFilter * > , * > WordDelimiterFilter * > , * > LowerCaseFilter * > and * > ASCIIFoldingFilter * > . > I am using my website in France, so I don't think I can use * > solr.EnglishMinimalStemFilterFactory * > . / > It seems unlikely, to me, that "touches" and "cartouche" would have the > same stem. But "touches" may or may not be an ok spellcheck correction > for your app. You can tweak the accuracy parameter. Also, if using > DirectSolrSpellChecker, check maxEdits. / > > Yes, I success to get around the problem by using threshold and acuracy > but it is not a perfect way for me, because it can miss few usefull > suggestions if these one are not well represented in the corpus... Thanks for your help. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Check-the-return-of-suggestions-tp4191383p4191856.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
