Is there a way to set solr to only return raw tf (i.e. by maybe turning off the DefaultSimilarity), so I could use ttf() to get the sum of raw tf values?
Or do I need to parse each tf value, square it and add them up in post-processing? Thx, Aki On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi, > > So you want raw tf. tf method implemented as square root of raw tf. So you > can re-obtain it by reverse operation. > 1.424 * 1.424 = 2.02 = int = 2 > > Ahmet > > > > > On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 11:31 PM, Aki Balogh <a...@marketmuse.com> > wrote: > Hi Ahmet, > > Thank you for your idea, very helpful. I can indeed get tf values through > the tf and ttf function queries. > > Since tf uses Similarity, I'm getting back some floats (i.e. "dog occurs > 1.424 times"), when I was expecting ints. > Is there a way to get back ints (simple word count)? > > Thanks, > Aki > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > Hi Aki, > > > > How about tf function query? > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Function+Queries > > > > Ahmet > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 7:59 PM, Aki Balogh <a...@marketmuse.com> > > wrote: > > I'm using solr TermVectorComponent to get term frequencies for specific > > terms in a corpus. I.e. I query for "q=dog" and want to get back term > > frequencies for "dog" in the corpus. > > > > However, when I request term frequencies, I get back ALL term frequencies > > for ALL matching documents, which is generating a massive response and > > wasting I/O. > > > > Instead, I would like to get tf for ONLY the terms that are an exact > match > > to the term in my query. > > > > Word count like this seems like it would be a common use case, but I > didn't > > see it in the code. > > > > > http://grepcode.com/file_/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org.dspace.dependencies.solr/dspace-solr-core/1.4.0.1/org/apache/solr/handler/component/TermVectorComponent.java#78 > > > > Is there a way to get this behavior without having to modify the source > > code? > > > > Thanks, > > Aki > > >
