Hi Shawn, Thanks for clarifying! And my apologies, it looks like my question was posted twice to the forum. I've also received replies from Erick and Chris to help clear out my confusion - on this thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201502.mbox/browser
Glad to see such an activity community though. :) Regards, Avanish On Tue Feb 03 2015 at 9:15:20 PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 2/2/2015 1:08 AM, Avanish Raju wrote: > > I'm learning to create collections by http for a new solr instance. To > > create a new collection called "*user6*", I tried the following: > > http://104.154.50.127:8983/solr/admin/collections?action= > CREATE&name=*user6* > > &numShards=1&replicationFactor=2&property.instanceDir=*user6*&property. > name= > > *user6* > > > > However, when I look at the status, instanceDir and dataDir are all fine, > > but the core name is instead: user6_shard1_replica1 > > This is exactly how Solr is designed to work. Without this naming > scheme, it is impossible to host multiple shards for the same collection > on a single Solr instance, a feature that *many* users require. > > I believe that in Solr 4.0.0, as well as the 4.0-ALPHA and 4.0-BETA > releases, the collections API actually would name all of the cores for a > collection with the same name as the collection, because it expected > them to all be on separate hosts. Later releases use the naming scheme > you have encountered. > > It is usually not a good idea to override the core naming that the > collections API creates (or the instanceDir/dataDir), but if you really > want to, and you understand all the ramifications completely, you can > use the Core Admin API to create the collection yourself manually. > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud#Creating_cores_via_CoreAdmin > > Even with the XXXX_shardN_replicaM naming syntax for cores, you can > still use the collection name in requests, like this. Such requests can > be sent to any solr instance in the cloud, and they will work properly: > > http://server:port/solr/user6/select?q=foo > > Thanks, > Shawn > >