If you can index stuff into a new schema for test, try defining one with dynamicField name=* stored=true indexed=true type=string. Your schema may have one like this commented out and/or set to false.
This would show you exactly what you are indexing and solve whether you have any spelling or format issues. In fact, I usually start my schema with just that one catch-all field (well, plus id and _version_) and reindexing over and over with incremental fields definitions. If that gets you nothing then you are either not sending it or doing some magic UpdateRequestProcessor to blow it away. Regards, Alex. ---- Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/ On 4 November 2012 at 13:15, Dotan Cohen <dotanco...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If any value is in a bogus format, the entire document batch in that HTTP >> request fails. That is the right timestamp format. >> The index may be corrupted somehow. Can you try removing all of the fields >> in data/ and trying again? >> > > Thanks. Seeing how all the documents are being added, either there is > a valid format in the created_iso8601 field or it is empty. I've > pretty much ruled out empty in code, but still nothing in the index. > > I'll play around some more and update the list. At least I am learning. > > > -- > Dotan Cohen > > http://gibberish.co.il > http://what-is-what.com
