Hello Trym, Can you clarify, which blockSize do you mean? And the second q, just to avoid unnecessary explanation, do you know what's Pulsing?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Trym Møller <t...@sigmat.dk> wrote: > Hi > > I have successfully create a really cool Lucene41x8PostingsFormat class (a > copy of the Lucene41PostingsFormat class modified to use 8 times the > default block size), registered the format as required. In the schema.xml I > have created a field type string with this postingsformat and lastly I'm > using this field type for my id field. This all works great and as a > consequence the .tip files of the Lucene index (segments) are considerably > smaller and the same goes for the Solr JVM Memory usage (which was the end > goal). > > Now I need to find the consequences (besides the disk and memory usage) of > this change to the id-field. I would expect that id-searches are slower. > But when will Solr/Lucene do id-searches? I have myself no user scenarios > where my documents are searched by the id value. > > Thanks for any comments. > > Best regards Trym > > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics <http://www.griddynamics.com> <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com>
