This bug was introduced in SOLR-509 (committed April 17th). I'm working on a fix now.
-Yonik On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hah, thank you for doing this. Sometimes I see MultiSegmentReaders, > > sometimes SegmentReaders, so both show up from time to time. Right now > we've > > got two MultiSegmentReaders open.. > > OK, this implies there's a leak and the initial searcher that is > opened never gets closed. > Could you open a JIRA issue for this? > > -Yonik > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Matthew Runo > > Software Developer > > Zappos.com > > 702.943.7833 > > > > > > On May 1, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > > > > > I can reproduce with solr/example setup. > > > What I did: > > > > > > 1. $ svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk TEMP > > > 2. $ cd TEMP > > > 3. $ ant clean example > > > 4. $ cd example > > > 5. $ java -jar start.jar > > > > > > (to post commit) > > > 6. $ cd $SOLR_HOME/example/exampledocs > > > 7. $ ./post.sh > > > > > > then see admin>statistics. I can see MultiSegmentReader instead of > > > SegmentReader, though. > > > > > > name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] main class: > > org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher version: 1.0 description: > > index searcher stats: caching : true > > > numDocs : 0 > > > maxDoc : 0 > > > readerImpl : MultiSegmentReader > > > readerDir : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:\Project\jakarta\lucene\solr\TEMP\example\solr\data\index > > > indexVersion : 1209693930226 > > > openedAt : Fri May 02 11:05:30 JST 2008 > > > registeredAt : Fri May 02 11:05:30 JST 2008 > > > name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] main class: > > org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher version: 1.0 description: > > index searcher stats: caching : true > > > numDocs : 0 > > > maxDoc : 0 > > > readerImpl : MultiSegmentReader > > > readerDir : > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:\Project\jakarta\lucene\solr\TEMP\example\solr\data\index > > > indexVersion : 1209693930226 > > > openedAt : Fri May 02 11:06:13 JST 2008 > > > registeredAt : Fri May 02 11:06:13 JST 2008 > > > > > > Koji > > > > > > > > > Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > > > > > Hmmm, if there is a bug, odds are it's due to multicore stuff - > > > > probably nothing else has touched core stuff like that recently. > > > > Can you reproduce (or rather help others to reproduce) with the > > > > solr/example setup? > > > > > > > > -Yonik > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > > > In using the SVN head version of Solr, I've found that recently we > > started > > > > > getting multiple open SegmentReaders, all registered... etc.. > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas why this would happen? They don't go away unless the server > > is > > > > > restarted, and don't go away with commits, etc. In fact, commits seem > > to > > > > > cause the issue. They're causing issues since it causes really stale > > > > > searchers to be around... > > > > > > > > > > For example, right now... > > > > > org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher > > > > > caching : true > > > > > numDocs : 153312 > > > > > maxDoc : 153324 > > > > > readerImpl : SegmentReader > > > > > readerDir : org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory@/opt/solr/data/index > > > > > indexVersion : 1205944085143 > > > > > openedAt : Wed Apr 30 14:04:15 PDT 2008 > > > > > registeredAt : Wed Apr 30 14:04:15 PDT 2008 > > > > > > > > > > (and right below that one...) > > > > > org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher > > > > > caching : true > > > > > numDocs : 153312 > > > > > maxDoc : 153324 > > > > > readerImpl : SegmentReader > > > > > readerDir : org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory@/opt/solr/data/index > > > > > indexVersion : 1205944085143 > > > > > openedAt : Wed Apr 30 14:30:02 PDT 2008 > > > > > registeredAt : Wed Apr 30 14:30:02 PDT 2008 > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Matthew Runo > > > > > Software Developer > > > > > Zappos.com > > > > > 702.943.7833 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >