I doubt it would be that many. I recommend tracking the searches and the clicks, and working on queries with low clickthrough.
Here are a few of mine from that sort of analysis: ghost dog => ghost dog, ghostdog ghost hunters => ghost hunters, ghosthunters ghost rider => ghost rider, ghostrider ghost world => ghost world, ghostworld ghostbusters => ghostbusters, ghost busters I don't see as many in personal names. Mostly, things like "De Niro" and "DiCaprio". wunder On 5/1/08 11:13 AM, "Geoffrey Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Walter Underwood wrote: >> I've been doing it with synonyms and I have several hundred of them. > > I'm dealing mostly with proper names, so I expect more like 80k of them > for our data :) > >> Concatenating bi-word groups is pretty useful for English. We have a >> habit of gluing words together. "database" used to be two words. >> Dictionaries still think it should be "web server". > > :) > > --Geoff
