Milliseconds. The thing to track here is your cumulative_hitratio. 0.7 isn't bad, but it's not great either. I'd be really curious what kinds of fq clauses you're entering, anything that mentions NOW is potentially a waste unless you round with "date math"....
FWIW, Erick On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:52 AM, heaven <aheave...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is getting better now with smaller caches like this: > filterCache > class:org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache > version:1.0 > description:Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=4096, initialSize=512, > minSize=3686, acceptableSize=3891, cleanupThread=false, autowarmCount=256, > regenerator=org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher$2@4668b788) > src:null > stats: > lookups:34 > hits:33 > hitratio:0.97 > inserts:1 > evictions:0 > size:282 > warmupTime:1879 > cumulative_lookups:51190 > cumulative_hits:35938 > cumulative_hitratio:0.7 > cumulative_inserts:15252 > cumulative_evictions:0 > > Is warmupTime in milliseconds or seconds? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Endless-100-CPU-usage-on-searcherExecutor-thread-tp4175088p4175553.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
