Yes of course, starting with an OOTB configuration seemed sensible and obviously there is scope for tuning. It occurs to me that a comparison between tuned and OOTB Solr would also be interesting. We do sometimes find Solr configs that are barely modified example files!
Cheers Charlie -- Charlie Hull www.flax.co.uk On Dec 9, 2014 5:22 PM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess when you said you did not tune instances, you really really > meant it. The Solr one looks like an example one with all the config > files and Carrot enabled, etc. > > I was hoping for a bit more TodoMVC style. I guess that's for the next > lull in the client work. Still, great to have it out there. > > Regards, > Alex. > P.s. I also realized that my presentation on Solr vs. Elasticsearch > now exists in two places on Slideshare. One under my own account and > one under LucidWorks one. Hmm. > Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov > Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart > Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 > > > On 9 December 2014 at 12:09, Charlie Hull <char...@flax.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We've been working on a study of any performance differences between Solr > > and Elasticsearch and we've also published the code we used - here's the > > background with links to Github > > > http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2014/12/09/comparing-solr-and-elasticsearch-heres-the-code-we-used/ > > > > Cheers > > > > Charlie > > Flax >
