You can't use grouping aliases and do full rebuilds on a separate core + substitutions? Might be a better strategy for nearly complete replacement.
Regards, Alex. P.s. But I like your proposal anyway. Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 On 3 December 2014 at 06:35, Alexey Kozhemiakin <alexey_kozhemia...@epam.com> wrote: > Dear All, > > We have a high percentage of deleted docs which do not go away because there > are several huge ancient segments that do not merge with anything else > naturally. Our use case in constant reindexing of same data - ~100 gb, 12 000 > 000 real records, 20 000 000 total records in index, which is ~80% deletes. > > We plan to deal with situation by playing with mergeFactor, > reclaimDeletesWeight and maxSegmentSizeMB settings to optimize for our > re-indexing rate and data size. > And in order to do it with eyes-opened we want to see a picture similar to > http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/02/visualizing-lucenes-segment-merges.html > with columns of segment size and %of deletes. > The plan is to expose SegmentInfos via /admin/luke handler and draw column > bars in Solr admin. > > Is there an easier way to achieve that? Even in raw Luke we didn't' found > these data. > > We'd be happy to push the changes to Solr afterwards. > > > Thank you, > Alexey Kozhemiakin >
