Hey Michael, Thanks for your reply. My use case is a little different. I would like to get the original values in facet queries but I would like to apply filter queries in a case insensitive fashion.
For example I require facet_query to return Quick, The, brown, ... But I want filter queries of the form fq=Term:"quick" Also could you please point me to some additional links on how I can index different variants of a token at the same position? -- Regards, Apurv Verma On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Michael Sokolov < msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote: > right -- missed Ahmet's answer there in my haste to respond ... > > -Mike > > > On 11/25/14 6:56 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > >> Hi Apurv, >> >> I wouldn't worry about index size, increase in index size is not linear >> (2x) like that. >> Please see similar discussion : >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5620 >> >> Ahmet >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:46 PM, Ahmet Arslan >> <iori...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Apurv, >> >> You can create an additional field for case sensitive search, and then >> you can switch at query time. You will have two fields (text_ci and >> text_lower) with different analysers populated with copyField. >> >> Ahmet >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 1:39 PM, Apurv Verma <ap...@bloomreach.com> >> wrote: >> Hey all, >> The standard solution to doing a case-insensitive match in lucene is to >> use a Lowercase filter at index and query time. However this does not >> preserve the content of the original document. For example if my inverted >> index is. >> >> Term Doc_1 Doc_2 >> ------------------------- >> Quick | | X >> The | X | >> brown | X | X >> dog | X | >> dogs | | X >> fox | X | >> foxes | | X >> in | | X >> jumped | X | >> lazy | X | X >> leap | | X >> over | X | X >> quick | X | >> summer | | X >> the | X | >> ------------------------ >> >> Is it possible to choose between case insensitive/ case sensitive match at >> query time. The index is stored in memory in solr. My question is, if this >> is stored as a hashmap with string key can I override the hashcode so that >> "Quick" and "quick" return the same hash value? >> >> Has anyone attempted this before? Is my assumption about index right? What >> would be the classes and code flow to look at? >> >> >
