Yes , We are waiting for the patch to get committed.
--Noble

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Sean Timm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Noble--
>
>  You should probably include SOLR-505 in your DataImportHandler patch.
>
>  -Sean
>
>
>
>  Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ् wrote:
>
> > It is caused by the new caching feature in Solr.  The caching is done
> > at the browser level . Slr just sends appropriate headers. .We had
> > raised an issue to disable that.
> >
> > BTW The command is not exactly
> > http://localhost:8983/solr/dataimport?command=status .
> > http://localhost:8983/solr/dataimport itself gives the status . But
> > even for an unknown command it just gives the status.
> >
> > --Noble
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Chris - what happens if you hit ctrl-R (or command-R on OSX)?  That
> should bypass the browser cache.
> > >
> > >  Otis
> > >  --
> > >  Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  ----- Original Message ----
> > >  > From: Chris Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >  > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > >  > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 6:04:05 PM
> > >  > Subject: Caching of DataImportHandler's Status Page
> > >  >
> > >  > I'm playing with the DataImportHandler, which so far seems pretty
> > >  > cool. (I've applied the latest patch from JIRA to a fresh download of
> > >  > trunk revision 651344. I'm using the basic Jetty setup in the example
> > >  > directory.) The thing that's bugging me is that while the handler's
> > >  > status page (http://localhost:8983/solr/dataimport?command=status)
> > >  > loads fine, if I hit reload in my browser (either IE or FF), the page
> > >  > won't update; the only way to get the page to provide up-to-date
> > >  > indexing status information seems to be to clear the browser cache
> and
> > >  > only then to reload the page. Does anyone know whether this is most
> > >  > likely a Jetty issue, a Solr issue, a DataImportHandler issue, or a
> > >  > more idiosyncratic problem with my setup?
> > >  >
> > >  > Thanks,
> > >  > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
--Noble Paul

Reply via email to