Re-index data is bad for me, it's 5TB of data, the time to re-index this data it's too much, but seem to be the only option I have.
On Sat 8 Nov 2014 at 13:10 Anurag Sharma <anura...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it possible to describe the exact use case here. > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > You encode that knowledge by using UpdateRequestProcessor. Clone the > > field, replace it with true, map it to boolean. That way, you will pay > > the price once per document indexed not (documentCount*) times per > > request. > > > > Regards, > > Alex. > > Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov > > Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart > > Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 > > > > > > On 7 November 2014 06:43, Nickolay41189 <klin892...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > > I want to sort by multivalued field like boolean values. > > > Something like that: > > > *sort exist(multivalued field name) desc* > > > > > > Is it possible? > > > > > > P.S. I know that sorting doesn't work for multivalued fields, but it > work > > > for single boolean field... > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sort-documents-by- > exist-multivalued-field-tp4168141.html > > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >
