Thanks Ryan. I just opened SOLR-546. Please let me know if I can provide further help. Cheers! h
-----Original Message----- From: Ryan McKinley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 2:33 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: better stemming engine than Porter? Hey- to create an issue, make an account on jira and post it... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR Give that a try and holler if you have trouble. ryan On Apr 21, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Wagner,Harry wrote: > Hi HH, > Here's a note I sent Solr-dev a while back: > > --- > I've implemented a Solr plug-in that wraps KStem for Solr use (someone > else had already written a Lucene wrapper for it). KStem is > considered > to be more appropriate for library usage since it is much less > aggressive than Porter (i.e., searches for organization do NOT match > on > organ!). If there is any interest in feeding this back into Solr I > would > be happy to contribute it. > --- > > I believe there was interest in it, but I never opened an issue for it > and I don't know if it was ever followed-up on. I'd be happy to do > that > now. Can someone on the Solr-dev team point me in the right direction > for opening an issue? > > Thanks... harry > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hung Huynh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:59 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: better stemming engine than Porter? > > I recall I've read some where in one of the mailing-list archives that > some > one had developed a better stemming algo for Solr than the built-in > Porter > stemming. Does anyone have link to that stemming module? > > Thanks, > > HH > > >
