Thanks for the advice. I've moved this query rewriting logic (not really
business logic) to a SearchComponent and will leave the custom query parser
to deal with the keyword (q=) related aspects of the query. In my case, the
latter is mostly dealing with the presence of wildcard characters.

Peter


On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>
wrote:

>
> : It's for an optimization. If the keyword is 'match all docs', I want to
> : remove a custom PostFilter from the query and change the sort parameters
> : (so the app doesn't have to do it).  It looks like the responseHeader is
> : displaying the 'originalParams', which are immutable.
>
> that is in fact the point of including the params in the header - to make
> it clear what exatly the request handler got as input.
>
> "echoParams" can be used to control wether you get "all" the params
> (including those added as defaults/appens in configuration) or just the
> "explicit" params included in the request -- but there's no way for a
> QParserPlugin to change what the raw query param strings are -- the query
> it produces might not even have a meaningful toString.
>
> the params in the header are there for the very explicit reason of showing
> you exactly what input was used to produce this request -- if plugins
> could change them, they would be meaningless since the modified params
> might not produce the same request.
>
> if you want to have a custom plugin that applies business logic to hcnage
> the behavior internally and reports back info for hte client to use in
> future requests, i would suggest doing that as a SearchComponent and
> inclding your own section in the response with details about what the
> client should do moving forward.
>
>
> (for example: i had a serach component once upon a time that applied
> QueryElevationComponent type checking against the query string & filters,
> and based on what it found would set the sort & add some filters unless an
> explicit sort / filter params were provided by the client -- the sort &
> filters that were added were included along with some additional metadat
> about what "rule" was matched in a new section of the response.)
>
>
> -Hoss
> http://www.lucidworks.com/
>

Reply via email to