Andrei, I'm wondering if you've considered using Classic replication for this use case. It seems better suited for it.
Michael Della Bitta Senior Software Engineer o: +1 646 532 3062 appinions inc. “The Science of Influence Marketing” 18 East 41st Street New York, NY 10017 t: @appinions <https://twitter.com/Appinions> | g+: plus.google.com/appinions <https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/112002776285509593336/112002776285509593336/posts> w: appinions.com <http://www.appinions.com/> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:53 AM, andreic9203 <andreic9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another idea, > > I turned off the replica in which I want to insert data and then to process > them, I started again, BUT, without -DzkHost, or -DzkRun, so the new > started > solr instance. I put my data into it, I stopped again, and I started with > -DzkHost that points to my zoo keeper. > > But the problem is that the ZooKeeper doesn't know about the changes from > the new replica, and voila, no replication, no nothing. > > Any idea? > > Thank you, > Andrei > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-replicas-stop-replication-and-start-again-tp4164931p4164954.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
