I'm going to inject a bit of caution here, since I've seen odd behaviors pop out in cases like this. But not, I admit, this particular case.
I'd just go ahead and try it on a test index first. It's always possible there's a safety check somewhere that'll be tripped by this kind of change. Erick@ParanoiaRulesSoTest On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 October 2014 04:40, Alan Woodward <a...@flax.co.uk> wrote: >> I don't think there's any definitive reference on what requires a re-index, >> but that would be a nice thing to add to the Reference Guide > +1 > > That's a really good suggestion. Even a minimal page could be a good > place we could add comments to as things are discovered. > > Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov > Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart > Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
