On 13 October 2014 10:08, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > I don't think it needs to be defined, but it can be thought of as > helpful to explicitly state a value in the example even if that value is > in fact the default, so a new user doesn't have to wonder what the value > is on those field types.
<rant> I think the issue here is "helpful" vs. "information overload". I feel each individual element is helpful but overall they become information overload and people are just afraid to actually read through their configuration files. Which means some other non-default actually-important settings are missed as well. Which, ironically, also negates "the user does not have to wonder" part because they never get that far. </rant> > After we verify that it is in fact unnecessary How would we do that specifically? My intuition (probably wrong) says that making that setting non-zero for dates/ints/longs does not actually do anything useful at all. Or does it? How does the phrase/proximity match works for non-text fields? I admit being somewhat confused on that. Regards, Alex. Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
