Just from a 20,000 ft. view, using the filterCache this way seems...odd. +1 for using a different cache, but that's being quite unfamiliar with the code.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Alan Woodward <a...@flax.co.uk> wrote: > > > > >> Once all the facets have been gathered, the co-ordinating node then asks > >> the subnodes for an exact count for the final top-N facets, > > > > > > What's the point to refine these counts? I've thought that it make sense > > only for facet.limit ed requests. Is it correct statement? can those who > > suffer from the low performance, just unlimit facet.limit to avoid that > > distributed hop? > > Presumably yes, but if you've got a sufficiently high cardinality field > then any gains made by missing out the hop will probably be offset by > having to stream all the return values back again. > > Alan > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours > > Mikhail Khludnev > > Principal Engineer, > > Grid Dynamics > > > > <http://www.griddynamics.com> > > <mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> > >
