Hello Erick,

Just wanted to let you know that I did the change you suggested and
everything works as expected.  Also, thanks for letting me know about the
Analysis page in solr.  I did not know about it and I have found it very
useful.

Thanks!

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Antelmo Aguilar <antelmo.aguilar...@nd.edu>
wrote:

> Hello Erick,
>
> Thank you so much for your help.  That makes perfect sense.  I will do the
> changes you suggest and let you know how it goes.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Erick Erickson [via Lucene] <
> ml-node+s472066n4160547...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>> You have your index and query time analysis chains defined much
>> differently. Omitting the WordDelimiterFilterFactory from the
>> query-time analysis chain will lead to endless problems.
>>
>> With the definition you have, here are the terms in the index and
>> their term positions as  below. This is available from the
>> admin/analysis page if you click the "verbose" checkbox, although I
>> admit it's kind of hard to read:
>> 1         2                       3            4
>> fatty  acid-binding     binding    protein
>>          acid
>>
>> But at query time, this is how they're being analyzed
>> 1             2                   3
>> fatty    acid-binding    protein
>>
>> So searching for "fatty acid-binding protein" requires that the tokens
>> "fatty" "acid-binding" and "protein" appear in term positions 1, 2, 3
>> rather  than where they actually are (1, 2, 4). Searching for "fatty
>> acid-binding protein"~1 would actually find this, the "~1" means allow
>> one gap in there.
>>
>> HOWEVER, that's the least of your problems. WordDelimiterFilterFactory
>> will _also_ "split on intra-word delimiters (all non alpha-numeric
>> characters)". While that doesn't really say so explicitly, that will
>> have the effect of removing puncutation. So searching for "fatty
>> acid-binding protein."~1 (note the period) will fail since the token
>> will include the period.
>>
>> I'd _really_ advise you to use the stock WordDelimiterFilterFactory
>> settings in both analysis and query times included in the stock Solr
>> release for, say, text_en_splitting or even a single analyzer like
>> text_en_splitting_tight.
>>
>> Best,
>> Erick
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 6:33 AM, aaguilar <[hidden email]
>> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4160547&i=0>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Erick.
>> >
>> > Below is the information you requested.   Thanks for your help!
>> >
>> > <fieldType name="text_ws_finer" class="solr.TextField"
>> positionIncrementGap=
>> > "100"> <analyzer type="index"> <tokenizer class=
>> > "solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> <filter class=
>> > "solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" splitOnNumerics="0"
>> splitOnCaseChange="0"
>> > generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="0" catenateWords="0"
>> > catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="0" preserveOriginal="1"/> <filter
>> class=
>> > "solr.StopFilterFactory"/> <filter
>> class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> </
>> > analyzer> <analyzer type="query"> <tokenizer class=
>> > "solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> <filter class=
>> > "solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> </analyzer> </fieldType>
>> >
>> >
>> > <field name="description" type="text_ws_finer" indexed="true"
>> stored="true"
>> > />
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Erick Erickson [via Lucene] <
>> > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4160547&i=1>>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hmmm, I'd have to see the schema definition for your description
>> >> field. For this, the admin/analysis page is very helpful. Here's my
>> >> guess:
>> >>
>> >> Your analysis chain doesn't break the incoming tokens up quite like
>> >> you think it is. Thus you have the tokens in your index like
>> >> 'protein,' (notice the comma) and 'protein-like' rather than just
>> >> 'protein'. However, I can't quite reconcile this with your statement:
>> >> "Another weird thing is that if I used description:"fatty
>> >> acid-binding" AND description:"protein"
>> >>
>> >> so I'm at something of a loss. If you paste in your schema definition
>> >> for the 'description' field _and_ the corresponding <fieldType>
>> >> definition I can give it a quick whirl.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >> Erick
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:53 AM, aaguilar <[hidden email]
>> >> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4160122&i=0>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hello Erick,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for the response.  I tried adding the debug=True to the
>> query,
>> >> but I
>> >> > do not know exactly what I am looking for in the output.  Would it
>> be
>> >> > possible for you to look at the results?  I would really appreciate
>> it.
>> >> I
>> >> > attached two files, one of them is with the filter query
>> >> description:"fatty
>> >> > acid-binding" and the other is with the filter query
>> description:"fatty
>> >> > acid-binding protein".  If you see the file that has the results for
>> >> > description:"fatty acid-binding" , you can see that the hits do have
>> >> "fatty
>> >> > acid-binding protein" and nothing in between.  I really appreciate
>> any
>> >> help
>> >> > you can provide.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks you
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Erick Erickson [via Lucene] <
>> >> > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4160122&i=1>>
>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Your very best friend here is attaching &debug=query to the URL and
>> >> >> looking at the parsed query results. Upon occasion there's some
>> >> >>
>> >> >> One possible explanation is that description field has something
>> like
>> >> >> "fatty acid-binding some words protein" in which case your query
>> >> >> "fatty acid-binding protein" would fail, but "fatty acid-binding
>> >> >> protein"~4 would succeed.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The other possibility is that your query parsing isn't quite doing
>> >> >> what you think, but adding &debug=query should help there.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Best,
>> >> >> Erick
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:10 AM, aaguilar <[hidden email]
>> >> >> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4160036&i=0>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hello All,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I recently came across a problem when I tried using
>> >> description:"fatty
>> >> >> > acid-binding protein" as a filter query when doing a query
>> through
>> >> the
>> >> >> query
>> >> >> > interface for Solr in the Tomcat server.  Using that filter query
>> did
>> >> >> not
>> >> >> > give me any results at all, however if I used description:"fatty
>> >> >> > acid-binding" as the filter query, it would give me the results I
>> >> >> wanted.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The thing is that some of the results I got back from Solr, did
>> have
>> >> the
>> >> >> > words "fatty acid-binding protein" in the description field.  So
>> I
>> >> >> really do
>> >> >> > not know what might be causing the issue of Solr not being able
>> to
>> >> find
>> >> >> > those hits.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Another weird thing is that if I used description:"fatty
>> >> acid-binding"
>> >> >> AND
>> >> >> > description:"protein" as the filter query when doing a query, it
>> gave
>> >> me
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > results I anticipated (with some extra results that did not have
>> the
>> >> >> exact
>> >> >> > phrase "fatty acid-binding protein").  Does anyone have an idea
>> as to
>> >> >> what
>> >> >> > might be happening?  Just in case this is helpful, the version of
>> >> Solr
>> >> >> we
>> >> >> > are using is 4.0.0.2012.10.06.03.04.33.  I appreciate any help
>> anyone
>> >> >> can
>> >> >> > provide.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-Adding-Filter-Query-tp4159990.html
>> >> >> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------
>> >> >>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >> discussion
>> >> >> below:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-Adding-Filter-Query-tp4159990p4160036.html
>> >> >>  To unsubscribe from Issue Adding Filter Query, click here
>> >> >> <
>> >> >> .
>> >> >> NAML
>> >> >> <
>> >>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > fatty_acid-binding_protein.xml (1K) <
>> >>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/attachment/4160048/0/fatty_acid-binding_protein.xml>
>>
>> >>
>> >> > fatty_acid-binding.xml (63K) <
>> >>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/attachment/4160048/1/fatty_acid-binding.xml>
>>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-Adding-Filter-Query-tp4159990p4160048.html
>> >> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------
>> >>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion
>> >> below:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-Adding-Filter-Query-tp4159990p4160122.html
>> >>  To unsubscribe from Issue Adding Filter Query, click here
>> >> <
>> >> .
>> >> NAML
>> >> <
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-Adding-Filter-Query-tp4159990p4160423.html
>> > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> discussion below:
>>
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-Adding-Filter-Query-tp4159990p4160547.html
>>  To unsubscribe from Issue Adding Filter Query, click here
>> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4159990&code=QW50ZWxtby5BZ3VpbGFyLjE3QG5kLmVkdXw0MTU5OTkwfC0xMDkyNTg2ODY3>
>> .
>> NAML
>> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>>
>
>




--
View this message in context: 
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-Adding-Filter-Query-tp4159990p4160921.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to