http://www.solr-start.com/javadoc/solr-lucene/org/apache/solr/update/processor/CloneFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html ?
Clone, not Copy. Regards, Alex. P.s. I welcome private email feedback on that resource page as well :-) Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 On 12 September 2014 17:02, Douglas Stonham <douglas.ston...@software.dell.com> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > That seems fair. The only downside I can think of is that I have to include > the copyField URP in every request handler that imports data. Not convenient > but not a big problem either. > > Do you happen to know the name of the URP that performs the copyField > functionality? I looked through the list at > (http://www.solr-start.com/info/update-request-processors/) but don't see one > that obviously fills the role (sorry if I missed something obvious). > > I could easily write one using the script URP but that sounds like it would > be much less performant than something built in. > > Thanks, > Douglas > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alexandre Rafalovitch [mailto:arafa...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 1:36 PM >> To: solr-user >> Subject: Re: Running an updateProcessor after copyField has occurred? >> >> If you do copyField equivalent in the request processor (there is a >> URP for that) before the script one, you would then not need to do the >> copyField in the schema. So, a move, not a duplicate. >> >> Or are things more complicated than that? >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov >> Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart >> Solr popularizers community: >> https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853 >> >> >> On 12 September 2014 15:49, Douglas Stonham >> <douglas.ston...@software.dell.com> wrote: >> > I'm using the StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory to run a script against >> data as it is imported. >> > >> > Some relevant pieces from solrconfig.xml: >> > >> > <requestHandler name="/dataimport" >> class="org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler"> >> > <lst name="defaults"> >> > <str name="config">data-config.xml</str> >> > <str name="update.chain">textCopyByLang</str> >> > </lst> >> > </requestHandler> >> > >> > <updateRequestProcessorChain name="textCopyByLang"> >> > <processor >> > class="solr.StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory"> >> > <str name="script">textCopyByLang.js</str> >> > </processor> >> > <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> > <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" /> >> > </updateRequestProcessorChain> >> > >> > In schema.xml I have a number of fields all being combined into one "text" >> field using copyField. Unfortunately this apparently doesn't happen until >> after the processor chain has completed so the script can't make use of the >> combined text. >> > >> > i.e. >> > doc = cmd.solrDoc; >> > text = doc.getFieldValue("text"); // text is null >> > >> > >> > Is there a way around this without duplicating all the copyFields inside >> > the >> processing script? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Douglas
