I'm not sure if i understand your question ... "unicode normalization" seems to be coming up in both your message and your example; plus your example suggests stop words are being removed, even though none of te words are removed from your original "field contains" string.
I *think* what you are asking is "if i remove stop words during analysis, will the words on either side of a stop word match as a phrase?" Example: original text: The Quick Brown Fox Jumped A Dog after analysis: quick brown fox jumped dog Aill that match a phrase query for "jumped dog" ? At the moment, the answer is "yes" because stop word removal doesn't reserve a position gap. there is an open issue to add an option so you can turn position gaps on when stop words are removed. when that gets commited the answer will be "maybe" depending on wether you allow any slop on your phrase query. : : While I am dealing with the headache unicode normalization(it drives people : into crazy;) ),I would like to ask, how Solr dealing with the phrase : matching? If I set all the symbol as a stop word, would I put myself into a : risk that I get a error matching? : e.g. A field contains: : This is a Unicode, normalization drive peopel into crazy. 5.0 is too far : away. : => (stopword removal) This is a Unicode normalization drive peopel into : crazy 5.0 is too far away. : Then phrase "crazy 5.0" or "Unicode normalization" we have a match for this : field? : : Thank you, : Vinci : -- : View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Phrase-matching-question-tp16523669p16523669.html : Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. : -Hoss
