Hi Shawn and Jack,

Thank you for your reply.

Yes, I want to run data import hander independently and sync it to Solr Cloud.
because current my DIH node do not only DB fetch & join but also many 
preprocessing.

Thanks,
Chunki.


On Aug 30, 2014, at 1:34 AM, Jack Krupansky <j...@basetechnology.com> wrote:

> My other thought was that maybe he wants to do index updates outside of the 
> cluster that is handling queries, and then copy in the completed index. Or... 
> maybe take replicas out of the query rotation while they are updated. Or... 
> maybe this is yet another X-Y problem!
> 
> -- Jack Krupansky
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Heisey
> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:19 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: external indexer for Solr Cloud
> 
> On 8/29/2014 5:21 AM, Lee Chunki wrote:
>> Is there any way to run external indexer for solar cloud?
> 
> Jack asked an excellent question.  What do you mean by this?  Unless
> you're using the dataimport handler, all indexing is external to Solr.
> 
>> my situation is :
>> 
>> * running two indexer ( for fail over ) and two searcher.
>> * just use two searcher for service.
>> * have plan to move on Solr Cloud
>> 
>> however I wonder that if I run indexing job on one of the solr cloud server, 
>> the server’s load would be higher than other nodes.
>> so, I want to build index out of sold cloud but….
> 
> In SolrCloud, every shard replica will be indexing -- it's not like
> old-style replication, where the master indexes everything and the
> slaves copy the completed index.  The leader of each shard will be
> working slightly harder than the other replicas, but you really don't
> need to worry too much about sending all your updates to one server --
> those requests get duplicated to the other servers and they all index
> them, almost in parallel.
> 
> For my setup (non-cloud, but sharded), I use Pacemaker to ensure that
> only one of my servers is running my indexing program and haproxy (plus
> its shared IP address).
> 
> Thanks,
> Shawn 

Reply via email to