Then don’t use schemaless. We need a LOT more info about the application.
wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ On Aug 29, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > bq: Can't you just use old fashion dynamic fields and use suffixes to mark > the > type you want? > > Not with "schemaless" I don't think, since you don't quite know what the > names of the fields are in the first place. It's unlikely that the input > format has field names like "age_t" that would map to the dynamic field.... > > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Can't you just use old fashion dynamic fields and use suffixes to mark the >> type you want? >> On 29/08/2014 8:17 am, "Ankit Jain" <ankitjainc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I would like to use schema less feature of Solr and also want to specify >>> the analyzer of each field at runtime(specify analyzer at the time of >>> adding new field into solr). >>> >>> Also, I want to use the different analyzer for same field type. >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Ankit Jain >>> >>
