On 8/15/2014 5:51 AM, Greg Solovyev wrote:
> What I want to achieve is being able to send the backed up index to Solr 
> (either standalone or with ZooKeeper) in a way similar to creating a new 
> Collection. I.e. create a new collection and upload an exiting index directly 
> into that Collection. I've looked through Solr code and so far I have not 
> found a handler that would allow this scenario. So, the last idea is to 
> implement a special handler for this case, perhaps extending 
> CoreAdminHandler. ReplicationHandler together with SnapPuller do pretty much 
> what I need to do, except that the action has to be initiated by the 
> receiving Solr server and I need to initiate the action externally. I.e., 
> instead of having Solr slave download an index from Solr master, I need to 
> feed the index to Solr master and ideally this would work the same way in 
> standalone and SolrCloud modes. 

I have not made any attempt to verify what I'm stating below.  It may
not work.

What I think I would *try* is setting up a standalone Solr (no cloud) on
the backup server.  Use scripted index/config copies and Solr start/stop
actions to get the index up and running on a known core in the
standalone Solr.  Then use the replication handler's HTTP API to
replicate the index from that standalone server to each of the replicas
in your cluster.

https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#HTTP_API
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Index+Replication#IndexReplication-HTTPAPICommandsfortheReplicationHandler

One thing that I do not know is whether SolrCloud itself might interfere
with these actions, or whether it might automatically take care of
additional replicas if you replicate to the shard leader.  If SolrCloud
*would* interfere, then this idea might need special support in
SolrCloud, perhaps as an extension to the Collections API.  If it won't
interfere, then the use-case would need to be documented (on the user
wiki at a minimum) so that committers will be aware of it and preserve
the capability in future versions.  An extension to the Collections API
might be a good idea either way -- I've seen a number of questions about
capability that falls under this basic heading.

Thanks,
Shawn

Reply via email to