Hi Erick Thanks for the reply. I'll have a look and see if it is any help. Again thanks for pointing me in the right direction.
regards Paul On 31 July 2014 11:58, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Take a look at WordDelimiterFilterFactory. It has a bunch of > options to allow this kind of thing to be indexed and searched. > > Note that in the default schema, the definition in the index part > of the fieldType definition has slightly different parameters than > the query time WordDelimiterFilterFactory, that's a good place > to start. > > WARNING: WDFF is a bit complex, you _really_ would be well > served by spending some time with the Admin/Analysis page to > understand the effects of these parameters... > > Best, > Erick > > > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Paul Rogers <paul.roge...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Guys > > > > I have a Solr application searching on data uploaded by Nutch. The > search > > I wish to carry out is for a particular document reference contained > within > > the "url" field, e.g. IAE-UPC-0001. > > > > The problem is is that the file names that comprise the url's are not > > consistent, so a url might contain the reference as IAE-UPC-0001 or > > IAE_UPC_0001 (ie using either the minus or underscore as the delimiter) > but > > not both. > > > > I have created the query (in the solr admin interface): > > > > url:"IAE-UPC-0001" > > > > which works (returning the single expected document), as do: > > > > url:"IAE*UPC*0001" > > url:"IAE?UPC?0001" > > > > when the doc ref is in the format IAE-UPC-0001 (ie using the minus sign > as > > a delimiter). > > > > However: > > > > url:"IAE_UPC_0001" > > url:"IAE*UPC*0001" > > url:"IAE?UPC?0001" > > > > do not work (returning zero documents) when the doc ref is in the format > > IAE_UPC_0001 (ie using the underscore character as the delimiter). > > > > I'm assuming the underscore is a special character but have tried looking > > at the solr wiki but can't find anything to say what the problem is. > Also > > the minus sign also has a specific meaning but is nullified by adding the > > quotes. > > > > Can anyone suggest what I'm doing wrong? > > > > Many thanks > > > > Paul > > >
