Jeryl Cook wrote:
Top often requested feature:
1. Make the option on using the "RAMDirectory" to hook in Terracotta(
billion(s) of items in an index anyone?..it would be possible using
this.)
This is noted in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-465
Out of cueriosity, any sense of performance with a terracotta index? It
seems like it would have to be *substantially* slower. Also, if it is a
RAM directly, does it persist?
If your looking to support billions of docs, perhaps consider:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch
ryan
