Thanks Christ. I probably have to repost this in Lucene mailing list.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>
> the topic has come up before on the lucene java lists (allthough i can't
> think of any good search terms to find the old threads .. I can't really
> remember how people have discribed this idea in the past)
>
> I don't remember anyone ever suggesting/sharing a general purpose
> solution intrinsicly more efficient then if you just generated all the
> permutations yourself
>
> : 2) I also want to relax PhraseQuery a bit so that it not only match
> "Senior
> : Java Developer"~2 but also matches "Java Developer"~2 but of course with
> a
> : lower score. I can programmatically generate on the combination but it's
> not
> : gonna be efficient if user issues query with many terms.
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Cuong Hoang

Reply via email to