Thanks Christ. I probably have to repost this in Lucene mailing list.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the topic has come up before on the lucene java lists (allthough i can't > think of any good search terms to find the old threads .. I can't really > remember how people have discribed this idea in the past) > > I don't remember anyone ever suggesting/sharing a general purpose > solution intrinsicly more efficient then if you just generated all the > permutations yourself > > : 2) I also want to relax PhraseQuery a bit so that it not only match > "Senior > : Java Developer"~2 but also matches "Java Developer"~2 but of course with > a > : lower score. I can programmatically generate on the combination but it's > not > : gonna be efficient if user issues query with many terms. > > > > -Hoss > > -- Regards, Cuong Hoang