Given the size of our index, using file checksums is more feasible. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 5:10 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Lucene index verifier
If someone wanted those additional checks, it seems like the right place to hook it in would be the snapshooter or snapinstaller. -Yonik On Feb 8, 2008 8:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Mike M. put up a tool called CheckIndex that is a simple > driver program that checks for corruption. However, my understanding > is that he isn't sure it is complete just yet, but it is a start. > Have a look in the latest release. > > Maybe it would be useful to have it run either on startup or > periodically in Solr (if configured to do so). I haven't tried it, so > I don't know what effect it has on performance/search/indexing. > > -Grant > > > On Feb 7, 2008, at 11:15 PM, Lance Norskog wrote: > > > (Sorry, my Lucene java-user access is wonky.) > > > > I would like to verify that my snapshots are not corrupt before I > > enable them. > > > > What is the simplest program to verify that a Lucene index is not > > corrupt? > > > > Or, what is a Solr query that will verify that there is no > > corruption? With the minimum amount of time? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Lance Norskog > > >
