Here is my situation.

I have 6 millions articles indexed and adding about 10k articles everyday.
If I maintain only one index, whenever the daily feeding is running, it
consumes the heap area and causes FGC.
I am thinking the way to have multiple indexes - one is for ongoing querying
service and one is for update. Once update is done, switch the index by
automatically and/or my application.

Thanks,

Jae joo


On Nov 12, 2007 8:48 AM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The advantages of a multi-core setup are configuration flexibility and
> dynamically changing available options (without a full restart).
>
> For high-performance production solr servers, I don't think there is
> much reason for it.  You may want to split the two indexes on to two
> machines.  You may want to run each index in a separate JVM (so if one
> crashes, the other does not)
>
> Maintaining 2 indexes is pretty easy, if that was a larger number or you
> need to create indexes for each user in a system then it would be worth
> investigating the multi-core setup (it is still in development)
>
> ryan
>
>
> Pierre-Yves LANDRON wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Until now, i've used two instance of solr, one for each of my
> collections ; it works fine, but i wonder
> > if there is an advantage to use multiple indexes in one instance over
> several instances with one index each ?
> > Note that the two indexes have different schema.xml.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > PL
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 18:05:43 -0500
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Multiple indexes
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am looking for the way to utilize the multiple indexes for signle
> sole
> >> instance.
> >> I saw that there is the patch 215  available  and would like to ask
> someone
> >> who knows how to use multiple indexes.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jae Joo
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Discover the new Windows Vista
> > http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
>
>

Reply via email to