On 10/25/07, Norskog, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This search has up to 8000 records.
does not compute... Are you saying there are 8000 records with contentid:00* > Does this require a query cache of > 8000 records? No, one query == one query cache entry. >When is the query cache filled? potentially on any query. > This answers a second question: the filter design is intended for small > search sets. Not sure I understand that. > I'm interested in selecting maybe 1/10 of a few million > records as a search limiter. Is it possible to create a similar feature > that caches low-level data areas for aquery? Let's say that the if query > selects 1/10 of the document space, this means that only 40% of the > total memory area contains data for that 1/10. Is there a cheap way to > record this data? Would it be a feature like filters which records a > much lower-level data structure like disk blocks? You lost me here too... what issue are you seeing? -Yonik
