On Oct 15, 2007, at 11:18 AM, Brian Carmalt wrote:
A field copy implies a doubling of the data in the Index, right? OR
should I not store or index the
dynamic field and instead copy it to another field, and then let it
be indexed and stored?
For a purely searchable field like an aggregation of *_en like we're
talking about, you don't need that stored so you it won't quite be a
doubling. It might only be a small increase in index size, actually.
Another possibility would be to search all fields, but that doesn't
seem to be possible. Or am I Missing something?
No, that is not possible without explicitly listing the fields in a
dismax request handler.
One thing you can do, though, is request the fields from Solr and
then use that to dynamically build your request. The
LukeRequestHandler will give you the list of fields in the index, and
the client could use those fields to construct the query.
Erik
