The sample schema in Solr 1.2 supplies two variants of integers, longs, floats, doubles. One variant is sortable and one is not. What is the point of having both? Why would I choose the non-sorting variants? Do they store fewer bytes per record? Thanks, Lance Norskog
- Non-sortable types in sample schema Lance Norskog
- Re: Non-sortable types in sample schema Yonik Seeley