ok. Hoss. I think I'll believe you since nobody raised any issue running the
script. And I'm about to try it out shortly with different solr home names.
So just to help my knowledge, where does this virtual setting of this "solr"
string happen? Should it be in some config file or sth?
thanks,
-Hui
On 9/20/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : home we have named. However, there's still the last part of my question
> : that feels suspicious why the "solr" string is directly coded in the
> script
> : (unlike other cases they usually use ${solr_root} to get to specific
> dirs.
> : ) I pasted this line again below:
>
> sorry ... i didn't realize you were talking about the script, i thought
> you were talking aboutthe docs.
>
> : I saw in snappuller line 226 (solr 1.2):
> :
> : ${stats} rsync://${master_host}:${rsyncd_port}/solr/${name}/
> : ${data_dir}/${name}-wip
> :
> : Is the above "solr" a hard-coded solr home name? If so, it's not
> desirable
>
> I'm not 100% positive, but I believe that is just an arbitrary "virtual"
> path relative the "root" of the rsyncd server ... it could be anything, as
> long as snappuller and the rsyncd agree on what it is, so it's hardcoded
> to be "solr".
>
> If we used ${solr_root} then the slaves and the master would have to use
> teh exact same solr home directory.
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
--
Regards,
-Hui
