Great. Thanks, guys. That's how what I thought. Any of you know whether the new "q:*.*" query performs better than the get-around solutions like using a ranged query? I would guess so, but I haven't looked into the Lucene implementation.
regards, -Hui On 8/15/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/15/07, Pieter Berkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not 100% certain but I believe this syntax was added in 1.2 (it > > certainly works in the svn trunk code), can anyone confirm this? > > Yes, It was added to Lucene 2.1 (which Solr 1.2 uses) > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/CHANGES.txt?view=markup > > -Yonik > -- Regards, -Hui
