Jeff, I reviewed your code a few days ago (and again today after seeing your email) and it looks good. I'm not as interested in the Query and Results namespaces since I pushed most of my facet and query code into the solr servlet. However I would like to use the Update, Indexing, and Configuration classes since they are more clean and flexible than mine :).
The problem is that I'm not ready to refactor anything right now since I have to get some things out soon. I would probably be ready to integrate SolrSharp in a couple/few weeks though and give some feedback. Thanks for the work. I might actually be able to contribute some code to this at some point... maybe in conjunction with my solr servlet code and how I do faceting and category navigation. Thanks, Mike -----Original Message----- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 2:13 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Solrsharp feedback Hi Jeff, Ah, smells like the same problem that Lucene.net is having - the lack of people with interest in C# here at ASF. :( I'm BCC-ing somebody who might be interested in looking at your C# client for Solr. Otis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share ----- Original Message ---- From: Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 11:42:11 PM Subject: Solrsharp feedback I sent a few messages to the list about Solrsharp, the C# library for working with Solr, a couple of weeks ago. This was the first iteration of the library and something I expected to see modified as others got a chance to review it. I've not heard any feedback since then, though. For those that have checked out the code, is it working for you? Does it make sense? thanks, jeff r.
