Thanks for all the comments. The conversion seems like a good alternative.
From: "Mike Klaas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr utf 16 ?
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:13:54 -0700
On 4/23/07, brian beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. I'm assuming if you have UTF-16 encoded data in a document that needs
to be added to the index, that solr would not be able to handle this?
I believe that handling arbitrary encodings is on the list of future
enhancements, but I couldn't give you a timeline.
For the time being, consider that
1. utf-8 is the "lingua franca" of xml document encoding
2. it is very easy to convert it yourself (it would be a 3-4 line
python commandline filter, frinstance).
-Mike
_________________________________________________________________
Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps.
http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag3
