yes, that is exactly what we are doing now ... copyfield with the filters ... we figured that much :)
but we are talking about a couple of million records, so the less data we copy the better ... but can someone please answer my question :'( is it illegal to put filters on the unique id ? or is it a bug that we get duplicate id's? or is this a know issue (since everybody is using copyfields?) thanks for all your replys ! grts,m "Paul Borgermans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16/03/2007 16:12 Please respond to solr-user@lucene.apache.org To solr-user@lucene.apache.org cc Subject Re: Bug ? unique id Hi Maarten Why not copy your unique id into another field with the required filters and use that for search? Regards Paul On 3/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > because we want to be able to search our unique id's :) > and we would like to use the Latin character filter and the Lowercase > filter so our searches dont have to be case sensitive and stuff. > > thanks for the quick response! > > grts,m > > > > > Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 16/03/2007 12:09 > Please respond to > solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > > To > solr-user@lucene.apache.org > cc > > Subject > Re: Bug ? unique id > > > > > > > Why in the world would you want to analyze your unique id? > > Erik > > > On Mar 16, 2007, at 6:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > we have been using Solr for a month now and we are running into a > > lot of > > trouble . > > > > one of the issues is a problem with the unique id field. > > > > can this field have analyzer, filters and tokenizers on it ?? > > > > because when we use filters or tokenizers on our unique id field, > > we get > > duplicate id's. > > > > thanks in advance, > > maarten > > >
