Might I suggest:
filter.query
filter.term
filter.<future expansion>
-Mike
On 2/9/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ft and fq work for me!
Erik
On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On 2/9/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> : The simplest form would be a term query with no escaping
>> whatsoever:
>> :
>> : Something like:
>> : fq=<!term f='education_facet'>High School
>>
>> I know yonik isn't a big fan of query param proliferation, and
>> there's
>> definitely going to be a need for some kind of markup in the
>> future to
>> denote which query syntax to use for different params, but if
>> facetting
>> and filtering is driving a strong need for a simple way to filter
>> on a
>> facet constraint term then perhaps a special param would make that
>> easier
>> ... in hte same way that "fq" is a filter query, perhaps "ft" can
>> be a
>> filter term: no analysys, just split on the first ":" found, and
>> make a
>> Term query using the LHS as the field name and the RHS as the term...
>
> Yes, I don't like the proliferation, but...
> ft=education_facet:High School
> is both simpler and 11 characters shorter than
> fq=<!term f='education_facet'>High School
>
> And I think term queries for filters are (or will be) very common in
> Solr. I think facet-related navigation isn't going to go away.... so
> I guess I'm not opposed to ft in this case.
> Anyone else have thoughts/alternatives?
>
> -Yonik
