Thanks for that. I am sorry this isn't really Solr-related but how can I monitor the swapping if I can't rely on the output of the free command?
Do you think I could still achieve any significant improvements by going through the performance tuning advice on the wiki? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: 11 January 2007 20:32 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance tuning On 1/11/07, Stephanie Belton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is the output of the free command: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root2]# free -m > total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 2007 1888 119 0 86 814 > -/+ buffers/cache: 986 1020 > Swap: 1992 207 1784 > > We normally have no swapping at all on this server and since last night > (when Solr was deployed on the site) it's been going up. That may be fine... swap in use != swapping. The OS may be swapping out some processes that haven't been used in a long time to free up more memory for disk cache (notice 814M cached). This is a good thing. > Here is an extract of the top command output sorted by memory usage, does > each of the processes really take up 566M??? No, older versions of linux show each thread as a separate process. CU usage is low because we are > outside of peak time but during the day it's at 40% when it used to be just > 20%: Full-text search is CPU intensive. An average peak of 40% seems acceptable. If the load gets too high, you can scale out by adding multiple servers behind a load balancer. -Yonik > 20:14:16 up 45 days, 21:47, 1 user, load average: 1.06, 1.14, 1.11 > 167 processes: 166 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped > CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle > total 8.8% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 6.9% 83.2% > cpu00 7.9% 0.0% 0.3% 0.7% 0.9% 6.9% 82.8% > cpu01 8.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 6.9% 84.0% > cpu02 9.9% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 6.9% 82.8% > cpu03 9.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% 7.0% 83.2% > Mem: 2055300k av, 1914588k used, 140712k free, 0k shrd, 89032k > buff > 1326540k actv, 301236k in_d, 30788k in_c > Swap: 2040244k av, 212948k used, 1827296k free 843380k > cached > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND > 12201 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:02 0 java > 12203 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 4:48 2 java > 12204 root 16 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 4:45 1 java > 12205 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 4:45 0 java > 12206 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 4:46 2 java > 12207 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 8:35 2 java > 12208 root 16 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 15:53 1 java > 12209 root 16 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 27:30 1 java > 12210 root 21 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 1 java > 12211 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 0 java > 12212 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:17 1 java > 12213 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:15 2 java > 12214 root 21 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 3 java > 12215 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:33 2 java > 12217 root 21 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 3 java > 12218 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 2 java > 12219 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 1 java > 12220 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 2 java > 12221 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 0 java > 12222 root 25 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 297:21 2 java > 12223 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:13 3 java > 12224 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 0 java > 12225 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 3 java > 12226 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 2 java > 12227 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 1 java > 12228 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 0 java > 12229 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 1 java > 12230 root 15 0 566M 561M 13276 S 0.0 27.9 0:00 1 java > Etc... > > On the server we also have a website running using mod_perl, it's been > running for 1 year and up until now the CPU usage was peaking at 20% and > memory around 28% no swapping. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley > Sent: 11 January 2007 15:12 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Performance tuning > > On 1/11/07, Stephanie Belton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Solr is now up and running on our production environment and working > great. However it is taking up a lot of extra CPU and memory (CPU usage has > doubled and memory is swapping). Is there any documentation on performance > tuning? There seems to be a lot of useful info in the server output but I > don't understand it. > > Swapping if it's constant isn't good... How much memory does this box > have, and what is the heap size of the JVM? Are there other things > running on this box? > > Solr does warming of caches by default to make complex queries that > hit a new snapshot of the index fast. This takes up CPU in bursts, > but is normally nothing to worry about unless you have other apps > running on the same box that need CPU. Because of this warming, CPU > usage of a Solr collection isn't directly related to query traffic at > all times. > > > -Yonik