FYI, I have just committed the a

On 5/8/06, Bill Au <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I was able to produce an OutOfMemoryError using Yonik's python script with
Jetty 6.
I was not able to do so with Jetty 5.1.11RC0, the latest stable version.
So that's the
version of Jetty with which I will downgrade the Solr example app to.

Bill


On 5/5/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Along these lines, locally I've been using the latest stable version
> of Jetty and it has worked fine, but I did see an "out of memory"
> exception the other day but have not seen it since so I'm not sure
> what caused it.
>
> Moving to Tomcat, as long as we can configure it to be as lightweight
> as possible, is quite fine to me as well.
>
>         Erik
>
>
> On May 5, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Bill Au wrote:
>
> > There seems to be a fair number of folks using the jetty with the
> > example
> > app
> > as oppose to using Solr with their own appserver.  So I think it is
> > best to
> > use a stable version of Jetty instead of the beta.  If no one
> > objects, I can
> > go ahead and take care of this.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > On 5/4/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I verified that Tomcat 5.5.17 doesn't experience this problem.
> >>
> >> -Yonik
> >>
> >> On 5/4/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On 5/3/06, Yonik Seeley < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > I just tried sending in 100,000 deletes and it didn't cause a
> >> problem:
> >> > > the memory grew from 22M to 30M.
> >> > >
> >> > > Random thought: perhaps it has something to do with how you are
> >> > > sending your requests?
> >> >
> >> > Yep, I was able to reproduce a memory problem w/ Jetty on Linux
> >> when
> >> > using non-persistent connections (closed after each request).  The
> >> > same 100,000 deletes blew up the JVM to 1GB heap.
> >> >
> >> > So this looks like it could be a Jetty problem (shame on me for
> >> using a
> >> beta).
> >> > I'm still not quite sure what changed in Solr that could make it
> >> > appear in later version and not in earlier versions though... the
> >> > version of Jetty is the same.
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to