In the instructions for pam_slurm_adopt
<https://slurm.schedmd.com/pam_slurm_adopt.html#ssh_config>, there are
instructions such as:
>
> Add the following line to the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d, such as
> system-auth or sshd (you may use either the "required" or "sufficient"
> PAM control flag):


This module is configurable. Add these options to the end of the
> pam_slurm_adopt line in the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ (e.g., sshd
> or system-auth):

Assuming an OS like CentOS does this mean it should be put in both?

slurm.conf on the node has:
UsePAM yes

slurm.conf has PrologFlags=contain and ProctrackType=proctrack/cgroup
I placed the call here only in /etc/pam.d/sshd making sure it is the last
line in the account stack.
#%PAM-1.0
auth       required pam_sepermit.so
auth       substack system-auth
auth       include postlogin
# Used with polkit to reauthorize users in remote sessions
-auth      optional pam_reauthorize.so prepare
account    required pam_nologin.so
account    include system-auth
-account   required      pam_slurm_adopt.so

so pam_sss.so is at the bottom of  /etc/pam.d/sshd
session     optional      pam_keyinit.so revoke
session     required      pam_limits.so
#-session     optional      pam_systemd.so
session     optional      pam_oddjob_mkhomedir.so umask=0022 skel=/etc/skel
session     [success=1 default=ignore] pam_succeed_if.so service in crond
quiet use_uid
session     required      pam_unix.so
session     optional      pam_sss.so

We're testing this on an idle node. I start an interactive srun. However
trying to ssh to the node gets:

Apr 18 11:13:41 node11 sshd[33355]: Authorized to dk2643, krb5 principal
u...@ouruni.edu (ssh_gssapi_krb5_cmdok)
Apr 18 11:13:41 node11 sshd[33355]: pam_sss(sshd:account): Access denied
for user user: 6 (Permission denied)
Apr 18 11:13:41 node11 sshd[33355]: fatal: Access denied for user user by
PAM account configuration [preauth]

Am I missing something?
-- 
slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-le...@lists.schedmd.com

Reply via email to