Hello,

I’ve got a problem that I’d imagine others have as well and am wondering how it 
is handled.

I produce periodic reports for my management showing, among other things, the 
overall “cluster utilization”, which we define as basically the ratio of 
CPU*Minutes allocated to CPU*Minutes available.   It’s a simplistic but handy 
metric for projecting growth, among other things.

Currently I grab this by running “sreport cluster utilization” and dividing 
“allocated” by “allocated + idle”, which gives us a pretty reasonable number.  
However, we recently added some cloud-based partitions.  I was hoping that idle 
nodes with state=CLOUD would not show up in this sreport output, but 
unfortunately they do.     Our cloud partitions are almost never used (they are 
essentially for emergencies), but because they are quite large it has dropped 
the computed utilization enormously.   Management is really only interested in 
the utilization of our on-prem components.

I can kludge this by manually subtracting out the ( (number of CPUs in all 
cloud partitions) * (number of minutes in the reporting period) ), but that 
would require me to determine and add back in all allocated minutes for cloud 
jobs, keep track of intra-day changes to the partition sizes, etc.

Are others encountering similar problems?   And if so, how do you resolve them?

--

Chip Seraphine
Grid Operations
For support please use help-grid in email or slack.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential 
and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by 
any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the 
sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are 
prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any 
attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any 
attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.

Reply via email to